The 2010s of Math Edtech in Review

EdSurge invited me to review the last decade in math edtech.

Entrepreneurs had a mixed decade in K-16 math education. They accurately read the landscape in at least two ways: a) learning math is enormously challenging for most students, and b) computers are great at a lot of tasks. But they misunderstood why math is challenging to learn and put computers to work on the wrong task.

In a similar retrospective essay, Sal Khan wrote about the three assumptions he and his team got right at Khan Academy in the last decade. The first one was extremely surprising to me.

Teachers are the unwavering center of schooling and we should continue to learn from them every day.

Someone needs to hold my hand and help me understand how teachers are anywhere near the center of Khan Academy, a website that seems especially useful for people who do not have teachers.

Khan Academy tries to take from teachers the jobs of instruction (watch our videos) and assessment (complete our autograded items). It presumably leaves for teachers the job of monitoring and responding to assessment results but their dashboards run on a ten-minute delay, making that task really hard!

Teachers are very obviously peripheral, not central, to the work of Khan Academy and the same is true for much of math education technology in the 2010s. If entrepreneurs and founders are now alert to the unique value of teachers in a student’s math education, let’s hear them articulate that value and let’s see them re-design their tools to support it.

About 
I'm Dan and this is my blog. I'm a former high school math teacher and current head of teaching at Desmos. He / him. More here.

5 Comments

  1. Reply

    This is true in the classrooms where Khan Academy is being used poorly. It is not true in the exemplary classrooms. Those classrooms provide Khan Academy as a useful tool for practice. Much of the writing on progressive/constructivist education takes for granted the importance of practice. When I’ve constructed an understanding and practiced applying the concept a few times,I still forget both the concept and how to apply it. I need to practice more, and repeatedly over time. Khan Academy provides a better environment for independent practice than I’ve seen elsewhere.

    It allows me, as a classroom teacher, to have three act task style lessons and to give time for students to explore why it works and how you know. I agree with your critique about the teacher tools, but they improve significantly each year. And they are free which really matters.

    A growth opportunity, in my opinion, is more effective tools for differentiation and supporting students with very diverse needs. At dinner school this year I had a couple students who really didn’t understand the idea of making ten and certainly didn’t know their addition facts to make tens. They required weeks of work on arithmetic to support work with variables which were terrifying. In the same classroom I had other students who were relatively confident with algebra 1. Khan Academy was very helpful but did not provide enough tools for supporting me in determining what skills students needed support with. By the end, the struggling students were able to build strong foundations on the number line and to turn fraction addition and subtraction into something more than rote algorithms (mostly applied incorrectly). I think we could’ve made more progress with better tools for tracking students student mastery.

    • Much of the writing on progressive/constructivist education takes for granted the importance of practice.

      Geez, well I don’t know about that, but I appreciate the illustration of how KA supports your work as a teacher.

  2. Aaron Kaswell

    January 7, 2020 - 5:31 pm -
    Reply

    New Classrooms/Teach to One actually gets it right by putting teachers at the center of a tech-driven classroom.

    • Yeah, I definitely overstated the case in a fit of hyperbole. I find that when I read content on teaching math from people who have a constructivist inclinations (like me), there is a lot of emphasis on open ended problems and exploration. I even find a lot of techniques for wrapping up and ensuring that the key ideas from a lesson were grasped by all students (this is an area where I see many constructivist classrooms struggle).

      But I don’t have a ton of advice for the kind of scripted independent repetition that I see as analogous to doing scales on an instrument or to doing drills in a sport. When I learn things, I definitely benefit from this kind of repetition over time as an antipode in the cycle to building my conceptual understanding. The fluency I get from the repetition gives me access to the conceptual work. I see Khan Academy as a great tool for enabling students to take some amount of independent responsibility for their practice. They primarily use the exercises to do this, but can also rely on the videos to refresh algorithms. This allows me, as a classroom teacher, to support exploration in building conceptual understanding. I think this is the primary overarching model of instruction that Salman Khan and his team envision for classrooms using Khan Academy. That said, in the Khan Academy content, they present many different models:
      https://www.khanacademy.org/khan-for-educators/getting-started-teacher-training-us/implementation-strategies-us/classroom-strategies/a/introduction-to-using-khan-academy-in-the-classroom

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *