My talk from the 2016 NCTM Annual Meeting is online. I won’t claim that this is a good talk in absolute terms or that this talk will be good for your interests. I only know that, given *my* interests, this is the best talk I have ever given.

My premise is that we’re all sympathetic towards students who dislike mathematics, this course they’re forced to take. We all have answers to the question, “What does it take to interest students in mathematics?” Though those answers are often implicit and unspoken, they’re powerful. They determine the experiences students have in our classes.

I lay out three of the most common answers I hear from teachers, principals, policymakers, publishers, etc., two of which are “make math real world” and “make math relevant.” I offer evidence that those answers are incomplete and unreliable.

Then I dive into research from Willingham, Kasmer, Roger & David Johnson, Mayer, et al., presenting stronger strategies for creating interest in mathematics education.

My call to action will only make sense if you watch the talk, but I hope you’ll take it seriously, give it a try, and let us know how it goes.

**BTW.** I’ve already received one email asking me, “Wait? Are you saying *never* make math real world?” No. My principles for instructional design often *lead me* to design applied math tasks. But “make math real world” isn’t a great *first-order* principle because, as a category, “real world” is poorly defined and subjective to the student.

**Featured Comment**

This was a really helpful talk in illuminating why it doesn’t work to simply drop a mundane math task into some sort of “relevant” or “real-world” context. And it was great that you didn’t stop at deconstructing these unhelpful approaches, but instead went on to share specific ways to think, steps to take, and tools to use to increase engagement and thoughtfulness in our math classrooms. A very natural follow-up to the famous “Math class needs a makeover” talk.

## 38 Comments

## Dan Smith

April 22, 2016 - 9:19 am -This was a really helpful talk in illuminating why it doesn’t work to simply drop a mundane math task into some sort of “relevant” or “real-world” context. And it was great that you didn’t stop at deconstructing these unhelpful approaches, but instead went on to share specific ways to think, steps to take, and tools to use to increase engagement and thoughtfulness in our math classrooms. A very natural follow-up to the famous “Math class needs a makeover” talk. Great work, Dan! Thanks!!

## Travis

April 22, 2016 - 10:26 am -Nailed it. It was great to this “fuller” version of the content here. It really helped fill in the cracks of some of the things I’ve seen before from other talks/presentations. I do think it is little tougher technologically than just a “white rectangle” though. Where can I get the “circle/square area” video? Do you ever make your slideshow available so we can use some of this in the classroom? At least just the video file? Thanks for all you do!

## Howard Phillips

April 22, 2016 - 11:23 am -I enjoyed the talk a lot.

Not telling all at the beginning of an investigation is a sure way of getting them thinking. However, in the case of the square and circle it’s a bit rabbit out of a hat to introduce the scale before someone has asked “How do we know where they are?”. Some prodding may be necessary. There is room for lots more thinking before the graphs are plotted, in fact they could generate these themselves using printouts of the process at different stages.

I wonder whether anyone ever asks “What rule is used to fix the sizes at each distance?”.

With the animals investigation one could say, once the full picture is supplied, “Now find a question about this, and answer it”. (not for beginner users of this approach!).

Now I’m going to spend the next six weeks trying to find a scenario that naturally leads to “completing the square” !!!!!

## Daniel Luevanos

April 22, 2016 - 11:57 am -This was definitely one of the highlights of the NCTM Annual for me. I immediately took your ideas and shared them with colleagues of mine during a PD at our district office yesterday…Don’t worry, I made sure to give you all the credit for the ideas I was presenting, including your jokes about the congruent triangles on an orca whale’s tail.

Here is my take on one of the dialed down questions I shared with them:

https://goo.gl/mo7l7a

I would love to hear your thoughts. Also, I can’t help but share what one of the teachers wrote back to me today:

“Last night, I geeked out and made even more ‘dialed down’ lessons. I completely changed the lesson I had planned for today and I can’t wait to try what I learned from yesterday’s PD. I can’t stop thinking of ways to make my students “crave” Math!”

You are inspiring more than you know, Mr. Meyer, including myself. I have a massive headache and craving time release aspirin, not the fast acting extra-strength stuff. Please keep the ideas coming!

## Laurie Hailer

April 22, 2016 - 12:06 pm -Thanks for posting this and writing more about it. I am working hard to keep engagement high. This week, we actually started with two blank triangles, one right and one obtuse. I asked kids to solve the triangle, and ask me questions. There were no measurements on the triangles. The triangles were to scale. They could ask me for one value.

From there, they had to measure another part of the triangle and let the solving begin. They could only measure one other part, no more. So, depending on what they chose, they would use different tools to solve the rest of the triangles. They used rulers or protractors, ratios, triangle sum rule, right triangle trigonometry and Laws of Sines/Cosines. They worked in groups to try to figure out what information they needed, they worked together to try different strategies. In the end, the only way they knew the answers were correct was by rationalizing whether or not they made sense.

We spent 1 hour on two problems. Engagement was high, completion rates were nearly 100%, participation was 100%. It was a really great day for me and I was able to coach them. They did the lifting. It was great. Great conversations.

I think this was an example of ‘not real world,’ but their interest was piqued because they had so much room to try to understand the problem and solve it. And, while the solutions were somewhat closed, they could all get slightly different answers based on their original measurements and decisions. Powerful.

I’m so inspired by your talks and your work. I really like that you’ve put out there this time: engagement is not reached by writing a polynomial closed question about snowboarding. That’s not interesting for students or teachers.

It was such a good experience, I’m writing a blog entry about it!

Thanks, Dan!

## Dan Meyer

April 22, 2016 - 12:55 pm -Travis:The white rectangle is weirdly versatile, though. Check out a few examples sent in via email and Twitter.

You aren’t wrong, though. The greater your technological capacity the more flexibility you have in posing a problem. The circle & square involved substantial After Effects work, for instance.

You can download those files and if you want anything else from the presentation (short of the entire file) please let me know.

Howard:I don’t know if that’s true. Or at least, I don’t share the premise that the students must have complete control over the posing of the problem. Once we’ve exhausted the problem’s interest

withoutthe number line, that’s a great time for me tointroducethe number line.@Daniel, thanks for passing along your example. I’d love to know what questions you asked on each slide.Laurie:Nice, yeah. I’m convicted that the

worlddoesn’t matter so much (“fake” or “real”) so much as the work students dowithinthat world.## Andrea Davis

November 15, 2016 - 7:03 pm -Dan Meyer,

Good evening. Thank you for the ideas presented in “Delete the Textbook “. Our elementary school district would like our teachers to receive this information and enhance our lessons in an effort to reach and teach all students.

As the speaker at the NCTM conference on this topic, will you please give me the Top 3 pieces of advice you have for the teachers of our youngest learners? We are K-6 and want to start now.

Thank you for your time and inspiration.

## Dan Meyer

November 16, 2016 - 5:58 pm -Thanks for the question, Andrea. It was provocative enough that I built a new post around it.

## Daniel Luevanos

April 22, 2016 - 1:57 pm -Questions I was thinking of for each slide:

Slide 1:

What is the first question that comes to your mind?

What do you think is in each bag?

Which bag do you think is heaviest?

Slide 2:

Do you think all the marbles are the same color, contain different colors, or a combination of colors?

Slide 3:

Which bag do you think you are most likely to pick one blue marble on the first try? Why?

Slide 4:

(extension) How many blue marbles would you need add to the other two bags such that the probabilities are the same?

What do you think?

## Dan Meyer

April 22, 2016 - 2:00 pm -@

Daniel, I guess the trouble I’m having with the first set of questions is that all the bags are the same image. So it’s difficult to even intuit which bag is the heaviest. I guess this is where I turn to some actual media — eg. photos of real bags. Not because they’rereal, which I don’t care loads about, but because the media facilitates estimation, which I carea lotabout.## Daniel Luevanos

April 22, 2016 - 3:03 pm -Great point. Looks like I need to buy marbles next time I’m at Target. Thanks for helping me get better!

## Gabrielle S Ladner-Mejia

April 22, 2016 - 3:10 pm -Thank goodness. I was beginning to get sick of hearing, “We have to make math real world”. You are redirecting our focus to the “math volume” in our classrooms via controversy and question developing. I appreciate you modeling how to “makeover/transform” the textbook problem. I am going to try question developing on “Completing the Square” using Algebra Tiles on Tuesday.

## Evan Weinberg

April 22, 2016 - 4:07 pm -A solid presentation, as always Dan.

Live deleting the textbook problems was a brilliant way to show the world that anybody can go through the process in a short time. I’ve found the same high value /effort ratio in doing this for students.

I wouldn’t be surprised if this became the opening activity for math department meetings this week.

## Ben R

April 23, 2016 - 5:51 am -Fantastic presentation and has really helped me with one issue which I have been mulling ahead of my maths (I am in the UK) teaching course. How do you combine engaging open-ended tasks with the need for students to develop the necessary confidence with tasks on which they are going to be examined in formal examinations.

I was really encouraged by the problem you used on surface area. I loved your way into the problem, but I also liked the way that you left all of the examples up on screen for students to do. Am I right in saying we need both? Perhaps, using the techniques you highlight and Prof Boaler discusses, we need fewer “drill” exercises, but am I missing the point if I say students need to do those exercises to get them used to the kinds of problems on which they are going to be examined?

## Lane Walker

April 23, 2016 - 6:40 am -Dan, can you address the practice of saying, “I can see many of you enjoyed this kind of thinking today. Here are some careers that employ the same kinds of thought processes.”

## Denis Roarty

April 23, 2016 - 7:23 am -@Daniel I was also confused by the first slides as they were all the same. Imagine if you started with the three images including the number of red and blue marbles. Along the lines of Dan’s presentation, it is something you can ask questions about.

I love the fact that you are doing this with your colleagues. It seems you are having your own puzzling sessions. Puzzling about the puzzles.

## Ruth

April 23, 2016 - 5:43 pm -I like your dial metaphor and I agree that mathematics should be intuitive, and this often means postponing rigor in the short term.

This year I broke from tradition while teaching similar triangles and just had my students create their own definitions for similarity & congruence, based on sets of images I showed. We also spent extra time on angle theorems because there was a lot to observe, debate, justify, and name.

These were class discussions and I didn’t formalize anything for them – I let them refine as necessary, and only suggested improvements to their vocabulary where it made sense.

I have no real evidence, but the engagement they brought to the task of solving problems with similar triangles, and the ease with which they have adopted basic trigonometry indicate to me that it was time well spent. It was also fun (way more fun than a lecture!!)

Pure math isn’t boring. Sometimes I think students are relieved when they aren’t expected to apply everything to the “real world”, and can just work on the theoretical stuff.

## Dick Fuller

April 24, 2016 - 8:13 am -Seems to me your definition of the “real world” as (1) the world about which questions can be asked, or (2) the world students (I) can ask questions about offers is a powerful insight into education and learning. A young student relies on a teacher who knows how to pose questions in terms of a student’s world that expand that students world. I am not a teacher, but let me presume a good teacher radiates recursion based on questions and problems, and that is where we pick up bootstrapping for ourselves.

I can see student alienation addressed by a stimulating instructor asking good questions. If the goal of math education is the ability to solve problems, then the student must come to know how make the questions. Real problems require an inductive approach: a real problem presents itself. I understand students must first be interested, but eventually they have to solve problems for themselves.

Let me offer another reason to strip down text book problems; they are generally artificial and obviously reverse engineered. They say “there is some important arithmetic I want to test you on, and I have put a layer of confusing words around the problem. I won’t teach you how to solve problems because you have to learn to put up with educational hazing”. At least that is how some students might be alienated by their math

## Martin Joyce

April 24, 2016 - 9:01 pm -I’ve found some of the best ways to start class is with the Which One Doesn’t Belong. Students are dying to share a thought that others may not have. It also has that low entry high ceiling aspect that we are always after. Example, most can pick out that one of the terms has a negative sign, while the rest are positive.

My one adventure into “deleting the textbook” that stands out to me is from last year, http://joyceh1.blogspot.com/2015/11/day-44-fal-day-2-fish-tale-revise-rugs.html, when I used the Fish Tale problem from yummy math:

http://www.yummymath.com/wp-content/uploads/fish-tale.pdf

When I think about it, all I did was leave the text of the story up and deleted the numbers. I think this year, I’ll delete the paragraph and the numbers… Ask for questions, notice, wondering, etc. Then ask what info they need to solve it (the dimensions), and then let them get after it.

One of my issues is getting them to show their work clearly so that when they do present before Act 3, that we can clearly see their thinking and follow it. I’m also trying to figure out how to have my EL and SPED students access these tasks easier.

So far, I can only think, in the fish tale, is a cloze sentence where they are suggested to use the pythagorean theorem with questions? This is a cloudy topic where I think we as teachers need more help with. How do we make these engaging situations and grade level topics more accessible for the students with less background knowledge?

## Dan Meyer

April 25, 2016 - 8:42 am -Lane:I’m not speaking from experience here, Lane, but your approach seems more promising to me than advertising the career, but delivering uninteresting thought processes. (The status quo I describe in my talk.)

Martin:The fish tank task is an interesting opportunity. One way I’d “delete the worksheet” is to delete (a/k/a temporarily withhold) the fact that the red line is shorter than the yellow line. Once the students know that fact, you can’t ask them to predict “Which path is fastest?”

It’d be nice also — before they’ve seen either path —Â for them to speculate the fastest route possible. To draw one. And then to draw a very slow route.

All of this is complicated by the 3D nature of the task, but these questions are all “lower dial settings” than the current task, which asks for calculation.

## Daniel

April 26, 2016 - 11:32 pm -Thanks for the great talk! I got a number of valuable insights for teaching maths out of it (plus some cool pointers for great presentations:)

As an aside, the starting question – how do we make maths engaging – is somewhat ill-posed in so far as there appear to me multiple different conditions well worth distinguishing. For example, from my experience making things engaging to primary school kids can be quite different to making things engaging for middle school or high school kids. Also (and sometimes related) the specific task of engaging kids in maths seems to depend at least to some extent on previous experience – kids that have had years of positive maths experience can probably stay reasonably engaged even with standard practice. On the other extreme are kids that have had no positive experience with maths for years. There may well be all kinds of other relevant variables here.

Also – and while I fully appreciate that you could not possibly adress all common approaches to life student engagement in your presentation and hence focused on three common approaches plus your own – let me just mention that there are a number of other approaches that appear promising (at least for some groups of students) too. I, for example, would like to highlight aesthetic considerations. Maths can be beautiful and many students can come to appreciate its beauty if teachers draw out the beauty in the maths and direct the student’s attention to it. Or gamification. So much of maths can be taught through games and a lot of students love games (and, of course, desmos has some fantastic maths activities/games!).

## Alyssa

April 27, 2016 - 5:51 am -This is great – thank you for posting it. I’m hoping to get into the high school system and have done 3-act math activities with high school classes.

Right now though, I’m teaching at the college level, and the class is basically a review of topics that are taught in grades 4-12. One issue is the courses are so jammed packed that there’s really no way to fit in the 3-act math. So, this gives me a lot of ideas that can be done in less time but are still more interesting than the “real world” problems we use in the lectures. Thanks again!

## Scott

April 27, 2016 - 7:01 am -Great talk Dan. I have the dubious honor of being the one who sent that ill-informed tweet in an effort to make the meatball problem more relevant to students. I recall having a realization after watching your 3-Act approach to this problem –it was not about the relevance per se; it was (partly) about lowering the level of abstraction to get students to buy in and want to solve the problem. Just because a problem is ensconced in some sort of “real world” scenario does not in itself create that “headache-in-need-of-an-aspirin” scenario that you have talked about in the past. When I have lowered the abstraction ladder, students’ questions are more inquisitive and nearly everyone is engaged.

Thanks.

## Dan Meyer

April 27, 2016 - 8:29 am -Alyssa:Great. My hope was to extract general instructional design principles from my 3-Act work that could be applied more generally — to pure mathematics!Â — and with smaller commitments of time. Do let us know how you apply them.

Scott:Well said. Glad you’re still willing to stop by and chat with us, Scott.

## Michael Pershan

April 27, 2016 - 9:27 am -Lots of fantastic stuff in this talk — I loved everything that you did with the white rectangle, and your take on “real world” is so sharp. (I cracked up when you toyed with the picture takers.)

My sense from the talk was that you imagine the math dial being turned up

within a lesson. Meaning, first we ask for questions, then for estimates, then we dive into the problem. This is in line with a lot of your Three Act work, I think, and I’ve seen it work well.Thinking about my own teaching, I more often find it helpful to turn up the dial over several days. This lets me use these early bits of the math dial as formative assessment, and I have time to think carefully about what they know and what they’ll need before productively struggling with a problem.

So, for instance, I might ask kids some lower-dial questions about a prism (noticings? estimations? etc.) a few days before I ask them to solve a prism volume question.

We always want to turn up the dial a bit during the lesson, but I think that’s a delicate matter.

## Dan Meyer

April 27, 2016 - 10:11 am -Michael:I’m sure there’s lots to say about how fast a teacher should move from the intuitive-concrete to the formal-abstract. But I’m always overjoyed to find teachers who offer students experiences along that continuum at all, at any pace, rather simply draping the formal-abstract in adjectives (real, relevant, gamified, etc.) and nouns (orca whales, Jose Blanco, etc).

## Dick Fuller

April 27, 2016 - 10:59 am -Dan wisely said conflict can help make discussion useful. Let me try to start some.

Common wisdom seems to say the solution to alienation ( we can use that word, right?) is found in presentation and rearrangement of the usual material. From the outside it looks like common wisdom could be the result of internalizing constraints imposed by the profession and the system. After all the material and the basic approach is the same, and still focused on the education system’s internal needs; standardized tests and preparation for the next academic level. Don’t get me wrong, 21st century entertainment values are likely an improvement all the way around, but they do not get at the heart of the problem.

We all need to learn how to use mathematics, almost none of us will ever do it Current school mathematics has virtually none of feel of real problems. This is not a question of their subject matter, it is their academic orientation inward toward number and arithmetic, nothing of real problems seen outside an academic stetting, they reflect no outside input.

This is not a question of vocabulary nomenclature, or subject matter. It is an inverted emphasis on numerical calculation. Formulation of the quantitative expression of the problem is the secret to real problem solving; this is not a question of algebra.

The current approach to school mathematics prepares students for a consumer role in an advanced society. To be productive participants they need be learning how to approach real problems.

## Sonny Yang

May 19, 2016 - 10:25 am -Long time listener, first time caller. I’ve been fortunate to work with some great colleagues, where we’ve been able to delete the textbook on many occasions. However, time constraints don’t always allow for that. Therefore, thank you for your blogs, as I use resources like your blog to be my secondary colleague.

While watching the video, I thought about how I would modify that iced coffee problem. If I used that problem, I would set it up like a 3 Act Math with a video of someone pouring a lot of ice into a cup followed by a (relatively) small amount of iced coffee. Or, I could have a discussion on one of my pet peeves: when the person at the counter gives me a lot of ice and barely any iced coffee. My questions to ask would be:

* How “much” ice is enough? How “much” ice is too much?

* How “much” ice would you want in your cup?

Follow-up students questions could be:

* “What is the size of the cup?” – I could either give each group a different size cup or purposely leave this open

* “What is the size of each ice cube?” – everyone gets the same dimension

My hope is to take this volume problem to dive into other topics, such as proportionality.

I really enjoyed this presentation and always learn something new or develop more questions and confusion (which is a great thing!). Thank you.

## Dan Meyer

May 19, 2016 - 4:16 pm -I like your style, Sonny. I gave the problem my own 3 Act spin here.

## Lisa

August 4, 2016 - 12:24 pm -Alright, I admit it. I still can’t figure out how you deleted the grid lines on the animal graph. Any pointers?

Thanks!

## Dan Meyer

August 4, 2016 - 5:41 pm -Magic!

## Jennifer

November 2, 2016 - 1:10 pm -After watching this video back in May, I attempted a version of the “deleting the textbook” with our curriculum in my 3rd grade class. The results were amazing. I recorded the lesson so that I may go back and review student responses, participation and engagement. I can only say how sorry I am that I didn’t start this sooner. The students took their collaboration and thinking to levels that some would have said were unreachable. I am now an instructional coordinator and have demonstrated lessons with this technique in grades 2-5. Success every time! The teachers are amazed with the student engagement and their buy in is solidified once I show them how easy it is to put together. Thank you.