I have to disagree that this is pseudocontext under the argument that (as I posted on the original CarTalk thread) that a trucker actually came to me with this problem a couple of years ago. He wanted a dipstick method that would give him more accurate fuel readings than his fuel gauge (I guess theyâ€™re universally inaccurate?). If a member of a profession brings you a real-life problem from their â€œworld,â€ I think that has to disqualify the problem from being labeled pseudocontext.
Does anybody have a problem with this? I don’t have a problem with this.