Occasionally I need to reassert myself as a math teacher, on this particular day because I realized Math Bloggers doesn’t include me in their tracker. Look! I am so a math blogger. So here’s what’s good lately:
Don’t Steal Nickels

I run this interlude in every age group. Awhile back some thieves got busted with a lot of nickels. The conversation on this one can’t be beat and eventually wraps itself around the idea that high cash value is great but has to balanced against the weight of a coin.
So you head over to Wikipedia and pick up coin images, then over to the treasury page detailing coin weights and you’re asking questions and taking bets constantly:
- Which would you steal right now? Knee-jerk reaction.
- Who’s on the face of a half dollar?
- Which is the lightest coin?
- [etc]
Then you have them calculate the ratios and you notice that one fantastic thing about the dime, quarter, and half dollar (consulting Slate if you’ve gotta) and you preface the whole thing with, “Let’s become smarter thieves.” Riveting.
Pick’s Theorem

Pick’s Theorem calculates the area of irregular, weird shapes using a grid for reference. I realized as the class bell rang I was only using boring irregular shapes (quadrilaterals that didn’t shake down into the usual categories) so I ran online, searched up Google Images for a fossilized footprint, put one dot down, and then copied-and-pasted-and-distributed-space-evenly the hell out of it until I had the picture above. All in a coupla minutes.
No image credit. I suck at that.
Fabulous Opener Numero Uno

Cherish the openers which a) span but one question, b) inspire fifteen minutes of sturdy work & discussion, c) incorporate real-world visuals, and e) play off their self-regard as savvy consumers.
Fabulous Opener Numero Dos

Those scamps took this one farther than even I wanted to, talking about subtracting the door’s and the window’s area from the surface area of each room, etc., etc.
Also, the third question didn’t show prices until I advanced the slide, so for a few seconds, we all argued violently over nothing more than carpet swatches, namecalling over color and texture.
Alright:
Well hopefully that settles that. I’ll see you all in a year or so.
8 Comments
Jason Dyer
February 29, 2008 - 1:15 pm -Could you talk about the what you do with the phobias?
Also, someone must have realized the error of their ways: you are on Math Bloggers as of this moment, as entry #4.
Rich
February 29, 2008 - 2:31 pm -Gotta admit, I stick around the dy/dan/digs longer when there’s some math pedagogy going on….
… and I also have to say that I’m a tiny bit curious if you meant that “Famous Idiots in History” heading to be a double entendre, sitting right there over many of our famous presidents.
dan
February 29, 2008 - 2:39 pm -Wishin’ I was that clever.
Benjamin Baxter
February 29, 2008 - 2:54 pm -Am I the only person who noticed that the presidents get better as their coin value decreases? In my opinion, anyway.
I think that’s worthy of an Indexed.
http://awaitingtenure.wordpress.com/
dan
February 29, 2008 - 2:57 pm -Sacagawea wasn’t a President though I’m sure you aren’t the first social studies teacher to make that mistake.
Heh.
dan
February 29, 2008 - 3:06 pm -P.S. Jason, the phobias have nothin’ to do with nothin’. I include something completely unrelated at the end of every opener. Sometimes it goes somewhere, sometimes it’s fun and nothing more.
Mr. K
August 27, 2008 - 7:39 pm -Here is a good followup on the nickel problem. Once again, one of those things I wish I was clever enough to come up with myself, but at least I can try to look semi-hip by passing it on.