Session Title
YouTube Math: Politics, Advocacy, And The Internet
Better Title
Math: Politics And Advocacy
Presenter
Marianne Smith, consultant.
Narrative
I enjoyed this session a great deal considering I only realized I had little interest in it after it was too late. Smith wrote the only description in the program featuring the word “blog,” so I thought I’d get my token 21-century session out of the way as soon as possible.
She started with two YouTube videos, both out of Washington State, each taking an opposing side in their math war:
- Math Education: An Inconvenient Truth, featuring a Washington TV meteorologist, polished to a shine, representing procedural fluency.
- A Parents’ Guide to Math Education in Today’s Classroom [sic], representing conceptual fluency.
We spent fully one third of the presentation on a) those two videos and b) a think-pair-share discussion with our neighbors. Marianne Smith did a fabulous job facilitating discussion between attendees but now, only a day later, I recall little of what Marianne Smith thought about any of this.
She did report that a grassroots site in Washington succeeded in dethroning the Superintendent of Public Instruction (a proponent of conceptual fluency) and installing one of their own (big procedural fluency fan). Most of the attendees in our session advocated not one or the other but – get this – a blend of procedural and conceptual fluency. (I love these people.) Smith urged us to become more active on committees at the state level, to write our legislators, and to make YouTube videos advocating our point of view
The crowd was satisfied. I’m curious if anyone has written the how-to guide for educational activism using YouTube videos and blogs I thought this presentation would be. Does anyone who matters (on a policy-making level) even read these things?
Visuals
PowerPoint. Traditional. All-white background.
Handouts
A comprehensive bibliography of Internet links, which is weird, right? I’m pretty sure this was the first time I ever transcribed a YouTube link from paper to web browser. Facing the same dilemma in my own session I tagged all my online resources in Delicious, but there is probably a better solution.
Homeless
- One particularly earnest and agitated audience member: “Maybe we should start a blog … get the word out.” This is how it all begins, isn’t it?
7 Comments
Ben Chun
December 7, 2008 - 10:04 am -Ten movies streaming across that, that Internet, and what happens to your own personal Internet? I just the other day got… an Internet was sent by my staff at 10 o’clock in the morning on Friday. I got it yesterday. Why? Why? Because it got tangled up with all these things going on the Internet commercially.
Sarah
December 7, 2008 - 10:19 am -I was wondering why you were tagging so many of your own pages. Guess I wasn’t paying enough attention to read what the tags were….
dan
December 7, 2008 - 10:30 am -@Ben, echoes of “tubes” and whatnot.
Jason Dyer
December 7, 2008 - 10:41 am -Most of the attendees in our session advocated not one or the other but – get this – a blend of procedural and conceptual fluency. (I love these people.)
Two extremes drowning out the middle is the norm for pretty much any political (or politicized) discussion.
I imagine that’s because it’s harder to make a passionate, heart-tugging plea to be balanced.
Mr. K.
December 7, 2008 - 3:47 pm -there is probably a better solution
For the few presentations I have done, I’ve created a resources page on my site. That allows me to present one single url instead of many. I also put up copies of the handouts, or the important parts of them.
It’s not a perfect solution either, but it moves everything to its own dedicated space.
Mr Follett
December 10, 2008 - 7:34 pm -“A youtube” hehe. I know who you’re talking about.