Dan Meyer

Total 1628 Posts
I'm Dan and this is my blog. I'm a former high school math teacher and current head of teaching at Desmos. More here.

Watch the Four ShadowCon Talks from #NCTMAnnual and Sign up for the Follow-Up Conversation

Image of the ShadowCon Auditorium

On Thursday at #NCTMAnnual, four speakers urged teachers to reflect on their power not just to help students encounter mathematical knowledge but to change how students define themselves in relationship to math and to each other.

Video of each of their talks is online right now and each presenter invites you to join them in a follow-up conversation about their ideas over the next month. (More below.)

  • Lauren Lamb told us about her experience learning mathematics as a young woman of color, how she often felt invisible in her classrooms and unrepresented in her textbooks. She described the ways her teachers did and didn’t involve her in her own mathematics education.
  • Javier Garcia contrasted the ways we talk about students (as though they’re incomplete, fallible) and mathematics (as though it’s complete, infallible) and made a case that teachers should reverse those two descriptions.
  • Nanette Johnson impressed upon the audience the fact that each of them will leave behind a legacy for their students, an indelible imprinting of their efforts, either positive or negative.
  • Andrew Gael revealed the potency of our presumptions about student competence, and how students often live up and down to those presumptions. What we believe about student competence affects how we work with those students, which affects their opportunities to develop competence.

Great talks each one. Each one well worth your time.

But what happens to talks like these after they’re over? The ShadowCon Hypothesis is that the ideas from even great talks rarely survive contact with the reality of classroom instruction; that absent any kind of conversation or community organized around their implementation, those ideas are too easily put in a box labeled “Nice to Think About” or “Maybe Later.”

Each of our speakers agree with that hypothesis and each one wants to participate in a conversation with you over the next month. Sign up for a course you’d like to think and talk more about. We’ll place you on an email thread with a couple of random, interesting colleagues. Then you’ll receive a new discussion prompt once per week for the next four weeks, starting May 7. On a weekly basis, the speakers will summarize the most interesting ideas and answer the most perplexing questions from across all the groups.

It’s going to be a very interesting month.

[image via Cassie Sisemore]

Where You’ll Find Me at #NCTMAnnual

The icon on my airplane’s wifi signal indicates I’m somewhere over Wyoming right now, en route to Washington, D.C., for collaboration and conviviality with thousands of math teachers from all around the United States. I’m looking forward to reconnecting with old colleagues and meeting new ones so let me tell you where we’ll find each other. If we’ve met, let’s catch up. If we’re just meeting, let me know what you’re working on or wondering about.

Wednesday

Desmos Preconference Workshop

A picture of the Desmos preconference at TMC in 2017

My team will be running a morning workshop and an afternoon workshop on our newest, hottest technology and activities.

Also: Emdin’s opening session; NCTM Game Night.

Thursday

ShadowCon

ShadowCon will be at 6PM on Thursday in Ballroom B.

Zak Champagne, Mike Flynn, and I have recruited four interesting speakers – Lauren Lamb, Javier Garcia, Nanette Johnson, Andrew Gael – each offering their own variation on a similar theme. The presenters and the organizers collaborated on these ten-minute talks for the last several months. The process was a joy and the resulting talks are really exceptional. We’ll also introduce a new way to continue the call to action of those talks long after they have ended.

Desmos Happy Hour & Trivia

The Desmos Math Trivia Happy Hour is Thursday April 26 from 6:30-9:30PM at Clyde's of Gallery Place in the Piedmont Room 707 7th St NW, Washington DC.

Beep beep! Right after ShadowCon, I’m speed-walking straight to NCTM’s Top Rated Happy Hour Event. Then we’ll commence NCTM’s Highest Grade Trivia Competition. I can’t divulge any of the categories but if you were to brush up on your naughty words that rhyme with math vocabulary, I don’t think you’ll regret the effort.

Also: Sessions with Stiff, Rosen, Briars, Usiskin, Cirillo, Pelesko, and time at the Desmos booth, trying to convince people to buy our free calculators and free activities. (Pretend you don’t see me, friend. Pretend you’re on the phone with your mother. Pretend I didn’t invent those exhibitor-dodging moves. We are having this conversation, friend.)

Friday

Full Stack Lessons

I know my talk is at 8 AM. I know that. But I’ll be bringing coffee for at least me and one other person in the room. Maybe three more people if I can find one of those coffee carrier trays.

Here’s the description:

Two teachers can take the same idea for a lesson and experience vastly different results in class. This is often because one teacher taught from the full “stack” of questions and the other taught from just part of it. We’ll look at the contents of that stack and learn how to put the full stack of questions to work in your classes.

Also: Zager, Martin, United Airlines.

Remainders

Here are three items that crawled into my head some time during the last few months and didn’t find their way out yet. This post is brain surgery.

Lesson Exploder

I have thought about this tweet from David Coffey at least once per week for the last five months.

The Song Exploder podcast interviews artists about the craft of songwriting. The artists describe their motivations for creating their songs, what they were trying to accomplish, and how they tried to accomplish it, all while the Song Exploder team teases out key elements of the song for illustration. I feel smarter about the craft of songwriting whenever I listen to it. Maybe not as smart as if I had spent a year at the Oberlin Conservatory of Music, but for how much smarter I’m feeling, it’s hard to argue with Song Exploder’s cost (free) and scale (internet-sized).

Now swap “teacher” for “artist” and “lesson” for “song.” I know what we can swap in for “Oberlin Conservatory of Music.” Classroom visits. Lesson studies. Problem solving cycles. Professional learning communities. Those are all very effective and also very expensive. I don’t know what to swap in for “Song Exploder,” though – an option that is less effective but basically free and scales with the internet.

What kind of digital media could we use to a) highlight something significant and useful about the craft of teaching b) as quickly as possible c) distributed as widely as possible d) in a form that’s replicable and episodic? (Song Exploder is up to 133 episodes right now.)

What current examples can we find? Teaching Channel videos? Blog posts? Lesson plans? Unedited classroom video? Marilyn Burns distills classroom anecdotes into really popular tweets.

What inspiration can we take from other fields? Delish videos? NFL Red Zone / Mic’d Up? Mystery Science Theater 3000? Twitch streaming?

New Jersey Turnpike

I can’t figure out the tolls on the New Jersey Turnpike.

If you don’t come from turnpike territory, how it works is you enter the turnpike somewhere and you exit the turnpike somewhere else. You pay depending on where you entered and exited.

My assumption is that the pricing would look pretty linear as a function of the miles traveled. Like this:

But it doesn’t. It looks like two linear functions with the second piece starting maybe at the Garden State Parkway. (Why?) And the Pennsylvania Turnpike exit is also way more expensive than a linear function would predict. (Why again?)

Here is the website that tells you the cost of different trips on the turnpike. Eric Berger, our CTO at Desmos, helped me type code into my browser’s Javascript console that returned all the data. Feel free to dig in. I’m looking for answers to my questions about pricing and I’m also interested in possible classroom applications of the data.

Cape Town’s Zero Day

Cape Town has a water crisis and a website that until recently calculated a “Zero Day” for their water reserves, a day when faucets will run dry and people will collect a daily allotment of water from central locations throughout the city.

That’s either terrifying or mathematically interesting, depending on which part of my brain I subdue while I’m thinking about it. How do they calculate that zero day? How can we put students in a position to appreciate, replicate, and even adapt those calculations for their own contexts?

Designing for Mathematical Surprise

“Surprising” probably isn’t in the top ten list of adjectives students would use to describe math class, which is too bad since surprise lends itself to learning.

Surprise occurs when the world reveals itself as more orderly or disorderly than we expected. When we’re surprised, we relax assumptions about the world we previously held tightly. When we’re surprised, we’re interested in resolving the difference between our expectations and reality.

In short, when we’re surprised we’re ready to learn.

We can design for surprise too, increasing the likelihood students experience that readiness for learning. But the Intermediate Value Theorem does not, at first glance, look like a likely site for mathematical surprise. I mean read it:

If a continuous function, f, with an interval, [a, b], as its domain, takes values f(a) and f(b) at each end of the interval, then it also takes any value between f(a) and f(b) at some point within the interval.

[I slam several nails through the door and the floor so you’re stuck here with me for a second.]

Nitsa Movshovits-Hadar argues in a fantastic essay that “every mathematics theorem is surprising.” She continues, “If the claim stated in the theorem were trivial it would be of no interest to establish it.”

What surprised Cauchy so much that he figured he should take a minute to write the Intermediate Value Theorem down? How can we excavate that moment of surprise from the antiseptic language of the theorem? Check out our activity and watch how it takes that formal mathematical language and converts it to a moment of surprise.

We ask students, which of these circles must cross the horizontal axis? Which of them might cross the horizontal axis? Which of them must not cross the horizontal axis?

They formulate and defend their conjectures and then we invite them to inspect the graph.

In the next round, we throw them their first surprise: functions are fickle. Do not trust them.

And then finally we throw them the surprise that led Cauchy to establish the theorem:

But you can’t expect me to spoil it. Check it out, and then let us know in the comments how you’ve integrated surprise into your own classrooms.

Related: Recipes for Surprising Mathematics

Rough-Draft Talk in Front of Hundreds of Math Teachers

This was new. I was on a raised platform with seven middle school students to my left and six to my right and several hundred math teachers surrounding us on all sides.

This wasn’t a dream. The MidSchoolMath conference organizers had proposed the idea months ago. “Why don’t you do some actual teaching instead of just talking about teaching?” basically. They’d find the kids. I was game.

But what kind of math should we do together? I needed math with two properties:

  • The math should involve the real world in some way, by request of the organizers.
  • The math should ask students to think at different levels of formality, in concrete and abstract ways. Because these students would be working in front of hundreds of math teachers, I wanted to increase the likelihood they’d all find a comfortable access point somewhere in the math.

So we worked through a Graphing Stories vignette. We watched Adam Poetzel climb a playground structure and slide down it.

I asked the students to tell each other, and then me, some quantities in the video that were changing and some that were unchanging. I asked them to describe in words Adam’s height above the ground over time. Then I asked them to trace that relationship with their finger in the air. Only then did I ask them to graph it.

I asked the students to “take a couple of minutes and create a first draft.” The rest of this post is about that teaching move.

I want to report that asking students for a “first draft” had a number of really positive effects on me, and I think on us.

First, for me, I became less evaluative. I wasn’t looking for a correct graph. That isn’t the point of a rough draft. I was trying to interpret the sense students were making of the situation at an early stage.

Second, I wasn’t worried about finding a really precise graph so we (meaning the class, the audience, and I) could feel successful. I wanted to find a really interesting graph so we could enjoy a conversation about mathematics. I could feel a lot of my usual preoccupations melt away.

After a few minutes, I asked a pair of students if I could share their graph with everybody. I’m hesitant to speculate about students I don’t know, but my guess is that they were more willing to share their work because we had explicitly labeled it “a first draft.”

I asked other students to tell that pair “three aspects of their graph that you appreciate” and later to offer them “three questions or three pieces of advice for their next draft.”

  • I like how they show he took longer to go up than come down.
  • I like how they show he reached the bottom of the slide a little before the video ended.
  • I think they should show that he sped up on the slide.
  • Etc.

If you’ve ever participated in a writing workshop, you know that workshopping one author’s rough draft benefits everyone’s rough draft. We offered advice to two students, but every student had the opportunity to make use of that advice as well.

And then I gave everybody time for a second and final draft. Our pair of students produced this:

Notice here that correctness is a continuous variable, not a discrete one. It wasn’t as though some students had correct graphs and others had incorrect ones. (A discrete variable.) Rather, our goal was to become more correct, which is to say more observant and more precise through our drafting. (A continuous variable.)

And then the question hit me pretty hard:

Why should I limit “rough-draft talk” (as Amanda Jansen calls it – paywalled article; free video) to experiences where students are learning in front of hundreds of math teachers?

My students were likely anxious doing math in front of that audience. Naming their work a first draft, and then a second draft, seemed to ease that anxiety. But students feel anxious in math class all the time! That’s reason enough to find ways to explicitly name student work a rough draft.

That question now cascades onto my curriculum and my instruction.

How should I transform my instruction to see the benefits of “rough-draft talk”?

If I ask for a first draft but don’t make time for a second draft, students will know I really wanted a final draft.

If I ask for a first draft, I need to make sure I’m looking for work that is interesting, that will advance all of our work, rather than work that is formally correct.

How should I transform my curriculum to see the benefits of “rough-draft talk”?

“Create a first draft!” isn’t some kind of spell I can cast over just any kind of mathematical work and see student anxiety diminish and find students workshopping their thinking in productive ways.

Summative exams? Exercises? Problems with a single, correct numerical answer? I don’t think so.

What kind of mathematical work lends itself to creating and sharing rough drafts? My reflex answer is, “Well, it’s gotta be rich, low-floor-high-ceiling tasks,” the sprawling kind of experience you have time for only once every few weeks. However I suspect it’s possible to convert much more concise classroom experiences into opportunities for rough-draft talk.

To fully wrestle my question to the ground, how would you convert each of these questions to an opportunity for rough-draft talk, to a situation where you could plausibly say, “take a couple of minutes for a first draft,” then center a conversation on one of those drafts, then use that conversation to advance all of our drafts.

I think the questions each have to change.

Geometry

Arithmetic

Algebra

[photo by Devin Rossiter]