Posted in uncategorized on May 31st, 2011 18 Comments »
With Interactive Exploration of a Dynamical System earlier this month and today’s Scrubbing Calculator, Bret Victor is doing some of the most provocative work in math education right now. As much as I’m curious how STEM educators perceive his work, I admit I’m much more interested in the perceptions of educators in the humanities and of people who, at one point or another, were totally put off by the abstract symbology of mathematics.
I’m also strongly inclined toward P.J. Karafiol’s critique:
If our goal is to empower students to do more and more interesting mathematics, we can’t just hand them simulators and tell them to go play: we need to teach them how to create those simulators. Doing that requires a lot of math and a lot of programming. So Victor’s “simulation” model of doing math ultimately requires teaching kids a lot of traditional mathematics.
Of course, replace “simulators” with “calculators” and we have another familiar argument. Obviously, I’m of two very different minds about this.
So John Scammell uploaded this #anyqs, which captured an interesting moment. In his tweet, he wrote, “When I was a kid, I’d grind other kid’s pencils down to nothing.”
John Scammell — Original from Dan Meyer on Vimeo.
Some things I’d like to accomplish in the redesign:
- Get the camera lens parallel to the pencil, an angle that makes it easier to see the length changing.
- Convey to the student visually what John wrote in his tweet: that this pencil is about to get ground down to nothing.
- Postpone the pencil measurements until the second act. The moment where John measures the pencil is useful and necessary but the first act (the #anyqs) should focus exclusively on curiosity and context. The math introduces itself later in act two to help resolve that curiosity.
Pencil Sharpener – Act One from Dan Meyer on Vimeo.
Pencil Sharpener – Act Two from Dan Meyer on Vimeo.
Pencil Sharpener – Act Three from Dan Meyer on Vimeo.
Download the full archive. [10.8 MB]
Large Candle – Stop Motion Teaser from Dan Anderson on Vimeo.
Frameworks are inherently limiting. The more guidelines you specify, the more material you exclude, some of which can be very good. Frameworks are great, though, because they make implementation easy. I know what happens in the first, second, and third acts of a mathematical story, so it’d be a simple matter to use Dan Anderson’s lesson in the classroom — no lesson plan or handout required.
Posted in anyqs on May 23rd, 2011 17 Comments »
The teacher put up this photo at the start of class and asked her students, “Where’s the maths in this picture?” She asked them to discuss the question in their groups while she took attendance. After four minutes, she pulled them back together and asked a student from each group to tell her where they found the maths in Wembley Stadium.
“The amount of seats,” one student said.
“Area and perimeter,” said another student.
“The number of seats,” said a third student.
“We already have the number of seats,” said the teacher.
The student tried again. “The, uh, perimeter … of the lines.”
The teacher pressed a little — what lines? what perimeter? — and then accepted it.
After two more groups, a girl named Sarah said something I can’t quite make out on the video, but the teacher was visibly floored.
“Have you read my lesson plan?!” she said. “Because that is very, very spooky. Because what we’re actually going to look at today is based on what Sarah just said. I’m a little bit … that’s very odd … but good stuff.”
What I’m suggesting with #anyqs and my last post is that:
- If you give students some photo of their world and tell them, “We’re definitely applying math to this — you figure out how,” you’re confusing the master and the servant in the relationship between math and their world.
- If a majority of your students are interested in a single question (eg. the number of seats) then use it. That’s a gift. Can math help your students resolve that curiosity?
- Conversely, if you are shocked when your students’ questions zero in on the point of your lesson, you’re designing your curriculum for the only person in the room you shouldn’t care about.
2011 May 24. Bowen Kerins picks up some of my slack:
There’s a big fault with this sort of question that you didn’t mention: students start skipping the mathematics altogether and try to determine what it is the teacher wants them to say. It’s the equivalent of the teacher asking “What number am I thinking of?” then waiting for a bunch of answers. It’s a totally different game, decidedly not math, and not even close to good inquiry-based teaching. Such questions should either be clarified or just not asked in the first place.
Posted in uncategorized on May 22nd, 2011 39 Comments »
Y’all have five days left to film fifteen seconds of video, make a graph, and upload them to Graphing Stories. Here’s my wish list:
- Someone climbing up a ladder and jumping off a diving board (height above water).
- Someone riding a merry-go-round or carousel (distance from center, distance traveled, height off ground).
- Someone riding an elevator, watching the lights change as the floors pass by (height above ground floor).
- An airplane taking off (elevation).
- Someone driving up to a stoplight and then a stop sign (speed, distance from camera).
- A step function. Any step function.
- Someone throwing a boomerang (distance of boomerang from thrower).
- Someone running the bases at a baseball diamond (distance from home plate, distance from the pitcher’s mound).
- Someone riding a ferris wheel (height above ground, distance from center, linear velocity, angular velocity).
Add yours to the comments. Better yet, make it and submit it!